Treatment of taxon names and concepts

From Species File Help
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replaced content with "There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here: ::[[Preliminary ...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms.  This has not been settled.  Both are presented here:
 
There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms.  This has not been settled.  Both are presented here:
 +
  
 
::[[Preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]]
 
::[[Preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]]
  
 
::[[Alternate preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]]
 
::[[Alternate preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]]

Latest revision as of 16:30, 13 September 2012

There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here:


Preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts
Alternate preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Species Files
Wiki
Toolbox