Treatment of taxon names and concepts
From Species File Help
(Difference between revisions)
(Replaced content with "There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here: ::[[Preliminary ...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here: | There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here: | ||
+ | |||
::[[Preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]] | ::[[Preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]] | ||
::[[Alternate preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]] | ::[[Alternate preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]] |
Latest revision as of 16:30, 13 September 2012
There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here: