|
|
| (5 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <table rules="all" border="all">
| + | There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here: |
| − | <tr align="center">
| + | |
| − | <th rowspan="2">Event</th>
| + | |
| − | <th colspan="2">Nomenclature</th>
| + | ::[[Preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]] |
| − | <th rowspan="2">Concept</th>
| + | |
| − | <th rowspan="2">Datanym</th></tr>
| + | ::[[Alternate preliminary design document for taxon names and concepts]] |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <th>Protonym</th>
| + | |
| − | <th>Multinomial</th></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A new species is described and published.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A species name is misapplied</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Different, may match previously existing concept</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A species name is misspelled</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A new species is described using a junior primary homonym</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A replacement name is provided for a junior homonym</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A revised description is given for a species</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A new species is described without qualifying under the rules of nomenclature</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A previously known concept is given a formal description</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Old datanym is deleted and new datanym created.</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>An incorrectly formed name receives a required emendation</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A name receives an unjustified emendation</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A species is transferred to a different genus. The spelling may change to match the gender of the genus.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Concepts for the two genera change, but not the concept for the species.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A new subspecies is described separating what was an undivided species.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>One new for the new subspecies</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Two new for the two subspecies</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Two new for the two subspecies</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Previous datanym becomes the datanym of the nominotypical subspecies. (This preserves relationships with other tables.) Two new datanyms are created.</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A new subspecies is described from an area outside the range of what was an undivided species.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>One new for the new subspecies</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Two new for the two subspecies</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Old concept moves to the nominotypical subspecies, one new for the other subspecies, one new for the species.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Previous datanym becomes the datanym of the nominotypical subspecies. Two new datanyms are created.</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A species is demoted to a subspecies in a species previously without subspecies.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Two new for the two subspecies</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>One new concept applies to the resulting species, two old concepts apply to the subspecies.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Previous datanym becomes the datanym of the nominotypical subspecies. The other subspecies retains its datanym. A new datanym is created for the species.</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A subspecies is made a synonym of the only other subspecies.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Concepts for the two subspecies are discontinued.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A subspecies is separated as a species different from the only other subspecies.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>One new, two old discontinued</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Concept for the previous species is discontinued.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Datanym for the species is no longer used. Datanym for the nominotypical subspecies becomes the datanym for the species. Datanym for the other subspecies remains.</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A subspecies is separated as a species different from the other two subspecies.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>One new</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Concept for the old species is replaced by a new one. Concept for the subspecies separated remains unchanged.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Datanym for the old subspecies becomes the datanym for the new species.</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A species group is described</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Not applicable</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Not applicable</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A form is descibed while forms were still permitted by the Code</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A form is described after forms were prohibited by the code</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A form described when permitted is raised to subspecies rank.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A form described when not permitted is raised to subspecies rank.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A nomen dubium species is described.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Not applicable</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A nomen nudum is described and cannot be identified.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>Not applicable</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | <tr>
| + | |
| − | <td>A nomen nudum species is described and can be identified.</td>
| + | |
| − | <td> </td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New if not an existing concept</td>
| + | |
| − | <td>New</td></tr>
| + | |
| − | </table>
| + | |
There are two positions on the eligibility of informal names (n. sp. 1) to be considered protonyms. This has not been settled. Both are presented here:
