Talk:Design Document
(Some design, higher level structure comments) |
(Deleted sections,cleaned up others --~~~~) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Some MediaWiki concepts, and/or special pages needing extra consideration IMHO due to their need for naming conventions, potential for ambiguity and disagreement, and their visible nature as entry points: '''portals'''; '''overview pages'''; '''categories'''; '''contents'''. | ||
| − | + | If and when whatever top categories are established, it seems that overview sections and/or portals then provide a general introduction to the main subcategories and other areas covered. Probably best if some sort of consensus established before somebody decides to just do it. Then again... Also, I deleted earlier section from SFS website...--[[User:Maehr|MikeMaehr]] 14:38, 6 April 2012 (CDT) | |
| + | |||
| + | Category lists looks like a great start. I'd keep as separate categories, and think about highlighting in general, the import and export of data. What's "Data source"? --[[User:MattYoder|MattYoder]] 08:06, 30 March 2012 (CDT) | ||
| + | "Data Source" within a SF has its own ID, is searchable and mostly just used in cases where reference not considered appropriate, e.g. if I uploads some of my own sounds or images or other data. --[[User:Maehr|MikeMaehr]] 14:38, 6 April 2012 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 6 April 2012
Some MediaWiki concepts, and/or special pages needing extra consideration IMHO due to their need for naming conventions, potential for ambiguity and disagreement, and their visible nature as entry points: portals; overview pages; categories; contents.
If and when whatever top categories are established, it seems that overview sections and/or portals then provide a general introduction to the main subcategories and other areas covered. Probably best if some sort of consensus established before somebody decides to just do it. Then again... Also, I deleted earlier section from SFS website...--MikeMaehr 14:38, 6 April 2012 (CDT)
Category lists looks like a great start. I'd keep as separate categories, and think about highlighting in general, the import and export of data. What's "Data source"? --MattYoder 08:06, 30 March 2012 (CDT) "Data Source" within a SF has its own ID, is searchable and mostly just used in cases where reference not considered appropriate, e.g. if I uploads some of my own sounds or images or other data. --MikeMaehr 14:38, 6 April 2012 (CDT)
